From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.avrupayazilim.com ([88.247.191.72] helo=avrupayazilim.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ke28W-0001t3-19 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2008 06:28:08 +0000 Message-ID: <48CA0C11.6080402@multitekarge.com> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:28:33 +0300 From: Ensar Gul MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Maturity of JFFS2 + MTD NAND Flash Support? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: ensar.gul@multitekarge.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > AFAIK, jffs2 doesn't handle correctly bit flip on read : it won't try to > copy the data on another block while the data can still be recovered > by ecc. > > I believe it could be a big issue for commercial product where no > corruption should happen. > > > Matthieu Is there a solution to the problem stated above yet? By the way, I also used JFFS2 on NAND flash as root filesystem in a telecom product. but the root filesystem infrequently becomes corrupt without any apparent reason. I`m considering to redesign the hardware and use an alternative device instead of NAND flash. any comments on this issue will be appreciated. rgds Ensar