From: Rohit <h.rohit@samsung.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: 'David Woodhouse' <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] [MTDPARTS] Support erase regions with odd numbered blocks
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:01:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491918AC.4090502@samsung.com> (raw)
Hi,
Currently add_one_partition in mtdpart.c does not handle erase regions
with odd number of blocks well. Some scenarios are :
1. Region 0 has 3 blocks of 256KB. Region 1 has 512KB blocks.
Partiton starting at offset 256KB and size 1MB turns read only.
2. Region 0 has 3 blocks of 256KB. Region 1 has 512KB blocks.
All partitions created on region 2 turn read only.
Every partition start offset should be multiple of partition erase size.
It is this condition which causes valid partitions to turn read-only.
The following patch is an attempt to allow such regions.
Is such a change to MTD core correct / acceptable?
Any suggestions are much appreciated.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Hagargundgi <h.rohit@samsung.com>
---
mtdpart.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
index 3728913..5cdc345 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -320,6 +320,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *add_one_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
u_int32_t cur_offset)
{
struct mtd_part *slave;
+ unsigned offset_checked = 0;
/* allocate the partition structure */
slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -436,6 +437,20 @@ static struct mtd_part *add_one_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
/* The loop searched for the region _behind_ the first one */
i--;
+ if (slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) {
+ /* A region starts on boundary of it's erase size.
+ * Partition offset within region must align
+ * on region's erase size
+ */
+ if ((slave->offset - regions[i].offset) % regions[i].erasesize) {
+ slave->mtd.flags &= ~MTD_WRITEABLE;
+ printk(KERN_WARNING"mtd: partition \"%s\" doesn't start on an "
+ "erase block boundary -- force read-only\n", part->name);
+ } else
+ /* Skip offset check below */
+ offset_checked = 1;
+ }
+
/* Pick biggest erasesize */
for (; i < max && regions[i].offset < end; i++) {
if (slave->mtd.erasesize < regions[i].erasesize) {
@@ -448,7 +463,7 @@ static struct mtd_part *add_one_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
slave->mtd.erasesize = master->erasesize;
}
- if ((slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
+ if (!offset_checked && (slave->mtd.flags & MTD_WRITEABLE) &&
(slave->offset % slave->mtd.erasesize)) {
/* Doesn't start on a boundary of major erase size */
/* FIXME: Let it be writable if it is on a boundary of
---
reply other threads:[~2008-11-11 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491918AC.4090502@samsung.com \
--to=h.rohit@samsung.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox