From: Hinko Kocevar <hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: number of MTD partitions
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:25:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491995BE.3080206@cetrtapot.si> (raw)
Hi,
What would be better: one big or several small MTD parttions on NAND chip?
It is 32M byte chip, we used to have 4 patitions each 8M byte, now I would
like to use one 32 M byte, and are looking for pros/sons in both cases.
Would n of GC at startup be better than 1?
Would scan of 1 big partition be equal to sum of n small partition scans?
Thank you,
HK
--
Hinko Kočevar, OSS developer
ČETRTA POT, d.o.o.
Planina 3, 4000 Kranj, SI EU
tel ++386 (0) 4 280 66 03
e-mail hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si
http www.cetrtapot.si
reply other threads:[~2008-11-11 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491995BE.3080206@cetrtapot.si \
--to=hinko.kocevar@cetrtapot.si \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox