* [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
@ 2009-01-08 16:07 Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2009-01-08 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd; +Cc: David Woodhouse
The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
supported as well.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -363,16 +363,6 @@ struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct
return NULL;
}
- if (extp->MajorVersion != '1' ||
- (extp->MinorVersion < '0' || extp->MinorVersion > '4')) {
- printk(KERN_ERR " Unknown Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query "
- "version %c.%c.\n", extp->MajorVersion,
- extp->MinorVersion);
- kfree(extp);
- kfree(mtd);
- return NULL;
- }
-
/* Install our own private info structure */
cfi->cmdset_priv = extp;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 16:07 [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002 Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2009-01-08 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-08 16:48 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2009-01-08 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Grandegger; +Cc: David Woodhouse, linux-mtd
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
> number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
> patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
> supported as well.
Instead of removing the test entirely, I'd suggest you augment it with
the manufacturer ID (cfi->mfr and cfi->id). Or better yet, just use
that information to fix up the version number to something sensible.
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
@ 2009-01-08 16:48 ` David Woodhouse
2009-01-08 16:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2009-01-08 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Pitre; +Cc: linux-mtd, Wolfgang Grandegger
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
> > number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
> > patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
> > supported as well.
>
> Instead of removing the test entirely, I'd suggest you augment it with
> the manufacturer ID (cfi->mfr and cfi->id). Or better yet, just use
> that information to fix up the version number to something sensible.
Couldn't you use a quirk to do the latter?
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 16:48 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2009-01-08 16:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 17:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2009-01-08 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: linux-mtd, Nicolas Pitre
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>> The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
>>> number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
>>> patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
>>> supported as well.
>> Instead of removing the test entirely, I'd suggest you augment it with
>> the manufacturer ID (cfi->mfr and cfi->id). Or better yet, just use
>> that information to fix up the version number to something sensible.
>
> Couldn't you use a quirk to do the latter?
The major/minor version number is not used anywhere else and therefore a
quirk seems to be overkill too me. But we may want to keep the message:
Unknown Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query version 0.0.
Wolfgang.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 16:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2009-01-08 17:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-08 18:21 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2009-01-08 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Grandegger; +Cc: linux-mtd, David Woodhouse
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >>> The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
> >>> number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
> >>> patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
> >>> supported as well.
> >> Instead of removing the test entirely, I'd suggest you augment it with
> >> the manufacturer ID (cfi->mfr and cfi->id). Or better yet, just use
> >> that information to fix up the version number to something sensible.
> >
> > Couldn't you use a quirk to do the latter?
>
> The major/minor version number is not used anywhere else and therefore a
> quirk seems to be overkill too me.
Please look again. Searching for "MinorVersion" turns up a couple
places.
A quirk is not overkill at all. To the contrary it's the whole purpose
of quirks to fix up things like this.
Although, in this case, I think quirks are evaluated only after the CFI
version is tested, meaning that the fixup might have to be done inline.
Nicolas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 17:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
@ 2009-01-08 18:21 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 18:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2009-01-08 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Pitre; +Cc: linux-mtd, David Woodhouse
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>> David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:47 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>>>> The NOR Flash memory K8P2815UQB from Samsung uses the major version
>>>>> number '0', which seems to be unusual but not illegal, IIUC. This
>>>>> patch removes the major-minor version check to get this Flash memory
>>>>> supported as well.
>>>> Instead of removing the test entirely, I'd suggest you augment it with
>>>> the manufacturer ID (cfi->mfr and cfi->id). Or better yet, just use
>>>> that information to fix up the version number to something sensible.
>>> Couldn't you use a quirk to do the latter?
>> The major/minor version number is not used anywhere else and therefore a
>> quirk seems to be overkill too me.
>
> Please look again. Searching for "MinorVersion" turns up a couple
> places.
>
> A quirk is not overkill at all. To the contrary it's the whole purpose
> of quirks to fix up things like this.
I see.
> Although, in this case, I think quirks are evaluated only after the CFI
> version is tested, meaning that the fixup might have to be done inline.
Yep, the patch below introduces cfi_fixup_major_minor() to do the quirk.
What do you think now?
Wolfgang.
---
drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/mtd/cfi.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -322,6 +322,14 @@ static struct cfi_fixup fixup_table[] =
};
+static void cfi_fixup_major_minor(struct cfi_private *cfi,
+ struct cfi_pri_amdstd *extp)
+{
+ if (cfi->mfr == CFI_MFR_SAMSUNG && cfi->id == 0x257e &&
+ extp->MajorVersion == '0')
+ extp->MajorVersion = '1';
+}
+
struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct map_info *map, int primary)
{
struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
@@ -363,6 +371,8 @@ struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct
return NULL;
}
+ cfi_fixup_major_minor(cfi, extp);
+
if (extp->MajorVersion != '1' ||
(extp->MinorVersion < '0' || extp->MinorVersion > '4')) {
printk(KERN_ERR " Unknown Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query "
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
@@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ struct cfi_fixup {
#define CFI_MFR_AMD 0x0001
#define CFI_MFR_ATMEL 0x001F
+#define CFI_MFR_SAMSUNG 0x00EC
#define CFI_MFR_ST 0x0020 /* STMicroelectronics */
void cfi_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct cfi_fixup* fixups);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 18:21 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
@ 2009-01-08 18:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-09 13:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Pitre @ 2009-01-08 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wolfgang Grandegger; +Cc: linux-mtd, David Woodhouse
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Yep, the patch below introduces cfi_fixup_major_minor() to do the quirk.
> What do you think now?
Looks fine to me.
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/cfi.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
> @@ -322,6 +322,14 @@ static struct cfi_fixup fixup_table[] =
> };
>
>
> +static void cfi_fixup_major_minor(struct cfi_private *cfi,
> + struct cfi_pri_amdstd *extp)
> +{
> + if (cfi->mfr == CFI_MFR_SAMSUNG && cfi->id == 0x257e &&
> + extp->MajorVersion == '0')
> + extp->MajorVersion = '1';
> +}
> +
> struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct map_info *map, int primary)
> {
> struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
> @@ -363,6 +371,8 @@ struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + cfi_fixup_major_minor(cfi, extp);
> +
> if (extp->MajorVersion != '1' ||
> (extp->MinorVersion < '0' || extp->MinorVersion > '4')) {
> printk(KERN_ERR " Unknown Amd/Fujitsu Extended Query "
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h
> @@ -520,6 +520,7 @@ struct cfi_fixup {
>
> #define CFI_MFR_AMD 0x0001
> #define CFI_MFR_ATMEL 0x001F
> +#define CFI_MFR_SAMSUNG 0x00EC
> #define CFI_MFR_ST 0x0020 /* STMicroelectronics */
>
> void cfi_fixup(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct cfi_fixup* fixups);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002
2009-01-08 18:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
@ 2009-01-09 13:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Grandegger @ 2009-01-09 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Pitre; +Cc: linux-mtd, David Woodhouse
Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>> Yep, the patch below introduces cfi_fixup_major_minor() to do the quirk.
>> What do you think now?
>
> Looks fine to me.
I just resent the patch with a proper description.
Thanks,
Wolfgang.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-09 13:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-08 16:07 [PATCH] CFI: remove major/minor version check for command set 0x0002 Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 16:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-08 16:48 ` David Woodhouse
2009-01-08 16:59 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 17:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-08 18:21 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-01-08 18:33 ` Nicolas Pitre
2009-01-09 13:04 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox