From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ernst.netinsight.se ([194.16.221.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LLJZj-00035z-WF for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:47:08 +0000 Message-ID: <49677171.3080300@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:46:57 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kZXJzIEdyYWZzdHLDtm0=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Witherspoon Subject: Re: BUG in jffs2 with MTD map using cached mapping References: <1231256507.49637bbb174b6@webmail.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <1231256507.49637bbb174b6@webmail.vt.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matt Witherspoon wrote: > I performed a bisection and the offending commit is > 205c109a7a96d9a3d8ffe64c4068b70811fef5e8. Before this commit, neither the BUG > nor the node CRC failure occured. > > One notable difference between my board and Mainstone is that my flash chip is > using the 0002 command set. > > I'm stumped at this point... Any suggestions on where to dig further? I'd say that the BUG_ON is a secondary error. A broken error path. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2008-April/021473.html