* NAND and JFFS2 newbie question
@ 2009-01-27 16:56 Will Wagner
2009-01-28 12:29 ` Nils Faerber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Wagner @ 2009-01-27 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Hi All,
I have an arm iMx31 board with 128M of NAND flash. It all appears to be working however I
get a lot of error/warning messages and I'd just like to check I am doing things right.
The NAND chip is a ST NAND01G-B2B used in 8-bit mode which has 2048+64 byte pages and 128k
block size. Linux is 2.6.24.7 with Freescale patches for MTD support on the iMx31 chip.
I am wanting to create a JFFS2 partition on the device. The partition is created using:
mkfs.jffs2 -s 2 -e 128 -c 12 -o fs.jffs2 -r jffs2_fs
Are these the correct arguments for the flash device I am using?
On the target I then do:
> flash_eraseall /dev/mtd4
Erasing 128 Kibyte @ 5f60000 -- 99 % complete.
Skipping bad block at 0x05f80000
Skipping bad block at 0x05fa0000
Skipping bad block at 0x05fc0000
Skipping bad block at 0x05fe0000
> nandwrite -p /dev/mtdblock4 fs.jffs2
Writing data to block 0
> mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock4 /flashfs
JFFS2 doesn't use OOB.
CLEANMARKER node found at 0x00000000 has totlen 0xc != normal 0x0
jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x05fc0010: 0xffff instead
jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x05fe0010: 0xffff instead
# nand_erase: attempt to erase a bad block at page 0x0000ff80
Erase at 0x05fc0000 failed immediately: errno -5
nand_erase: attempt to erase a bad block at page 0x0000ffc0
Erase at 0x05fe0000 failed immediately: errno -5
Does this seem right? Why doesn't it use OOB and why is the cleanmarker wrong?
It all seems to be working but any advice on whether I am doing things write and if the
output is all acceptable warnings would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Will
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Wagner will_wagner@carallon.com
Development Manager Office Tel: +44 (0)20 7371 2032
Carallon Ltd, Studio G20, Shepherds Building, Rockley Rd, London W14 0DA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: NAND and JFFS2 newbie question
2009-01-27 16:56 NAND and JFFS2 newbie question Will Wagner
@ 2009-01-28 12:29 ` Nils Faerber
2009-01-28 13:19 ` Will Wagner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nils Faerber @ 2009-01-28 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Wagner; +Cc: linux-mtd
Will Wagner schrieb:
> Hi All,
>
> I have an arm iMx31 board with 128M of NAND flash. It all appears to be working however I
> get a lot of error/warning messages and I'd just like to check I am doing things right.
>
> The NAND chip is a ST NAND01G-B2B used in 8-bit mode which has 2048+64 byte pages and 128k
> block size. Linux is 2.6.24.7 with Freescale patches for MTD support on the iMx31 chip.
>
> I am wanting to create a JFFS2 partition on the device. The partition is created using:
>
> mkfs.jffs2 -s 2 -e 128 -c 12 -o fs.jffs2 -r jffs2_fs
I guess one of the problems will be that the sizes you specified are way
too small. Fomr the man-page of mkfs.jffs2:
"Options that take SIZE arguments can be specified as either decimal
(e.g., 65536), octal (0200000), or hexidecimal (0x1000)"
So for an eraseblocksize of 128kbytes you would specify "-e 131072".
Wrong settings can confuse jffs2 pretty easily.
> Thanks,
> Will
Cheers
nils faerber
--
kernel concepts GbR Tel: +49-271-771091-12
Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 Fax: +49-271-771091-19
D-57072 Siegen Mob: +49-176-21024535
http://www.kernelconcepts.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: NAND and JFFS2 newbie question
2009-01-28 12:29 ` Nils Faerber
@ 2009-01-28 13:19 ` Will Wagner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Will Wagner @ 2009-01-28 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nils Faerber; +Cc: linux-mtd
Nils Faerber wrote:
>> I am wanting to create a JFFS2 partition on the device. The partition is created using:
>>
>> mkfs.jffs2 -s 2 -e 128 -c 12 -o fs.jffs2 -r jffs2_fs
>
> I guess one of the problems will be that the sizes you specified are way
> too small. Fomr the man-page of mkfs.jffs2:
> "Options that take SIZE arguments can be specified as either decimal
> (e.g., 65536), octal (0200000), or hexidecimal (0x1000)"
>
The man page seemed to imply that values under 4096 would be treated as KiB so -e 128
should be correct. However the page size looks like it doesn't do that and so it should be
set to 2048.
As an aside do I need to specify the -c option or is it not needed? If it is needed is 12
the correct size for the clean marker?
Thanks,
Will
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will Wagner will_wagner@carallon.com
Development Manager Office Tel: +44 (0)20 7371 2032
Carallon Ltd, Studio G20, Shepherds Building, Rockley Rd, London W14 0DA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-28 13:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-27 16:56 NAND and JFFS2 newbie question Will Wagner
2009-01-28 12:29 ` Nils Faerber
2009-01-28 13:19 ` Will Wagner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox