public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: "davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com"
	<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
	"Narnakaje, Snehaprabha" <nsnehaprabha@ti.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 15:37:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0362A5.3010101@boundarydevices.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905071011.06812.david-b@pacbell.net>

>>>> +static struct nand_ecclayout hwecc4_2048 __initconst = {
>>>> +       .eccbytes = 10,
>>> Not ".eccbytes = 40"?  This is 4 chunks, 10 ecc bytes each...
>> No, .eccbytes is for each chips->ecc.steps. 
> 
> So it's the same as ecc.bytes, which is not exported to userspace.
> 
> 
>> And all nand read/write 
>> APIs, we handle ecc.steps (for loop). There is chips->ecc.total that
>> is initialized as (chips->ecc.steps * chips->ecc.bytes).  
>>
>> It is strange that .eccbytes is for each chunk, while eccpos[] and
>> .oobfree[] have to handle/cover all chunks. 

No, eccbytes should equal ecc.total


i.e. from nand_base.c

static struct nand_ecclayout nand_oob_64 = {
        .eccbytes = 24,
        .eccpos = {
                   40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
                   48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55,
                   56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63},
        .oobfree = {
                {.offset = 2,
                 .length = 38}}
};
Troy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-07 22:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-07  2:29 [PATCH 2/2] NAND on DM355: Add 4-bit ECC support for large page NAND chips nsnehaprabha
2009-05-07  7:16 ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 14:13   ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 17:11     ` David Brownell
2009-05-07 18:02       ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
2009-05-07 22:37       ` Troy Kisky [this message]
2009-05-08  0:03         ` Narnakaje, Snehaprabha
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-07  8:59 vimal singh
2009-05-07  9:11 ` David Brownell
     [not found] <46149.192.168.10.89.1241686786.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-07  9:50 ` vimal singh
2009-05-07 16:54   ` David Brownell
     [not found] <43965.192.168.10.89.1241763647.squirrel@dbdmail.itg.ti.com>
2009-05-09  4:24 ` vimal singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0362A5.3010101@boundarydevices.com \
    --to=troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nsnehaprabha@ti.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox