From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MDiD7-0003Wm-Fp for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:48 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MDiD5-00085m-NL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:35 +0000 Received: from adsl-99-185-243-218.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net ([99.185.243.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:35 +0000 Received: from nahor.j+gmane by adsl-99-185-243-218.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:00:35 +0000 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Nahor Subject: Re: Nandwrite's behavior in case of write failure Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 10:00:19 -0700 Message-ID: <4A2D43A3.7070105@gmail.com> References: <1244205087.5847.66.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4A29D723.1010109@gmail.com> <1244365076.5847.317.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1244365076.5847.317.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: news List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > I wonder, it it would make sense > to use libmtd.c from UBI utils and re-write nandwrite? Of course > libmtd.c would need to be improved as well. But the benefit would be > shared code between ubiformat and nandwrite. I've been thinking that too. Unfortunately, I've too much work on my hands already and I don't have the time for things that are not strictly necessary. :(