public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OneNAND: Runtime badblock check support
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:28:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A66BF8D.9010902@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c9fda240907220011r10d76dfya3366c170a496e19@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/22/2009 10:11 AM, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> It don't avoid the double-scanning issue. only partial scan at
> bootloader. In my environemt kernel has 2MiB partition and we only
> scan this partition at load kernel command.
> Exactly that it skip the bad block scanning except the kernel
> partition at bootloader
> As bootcmd load kernel, it first check that read block is bad, if not
> read this block, next check again next block, and read next block and
> so on.

So you have a small kernel partition, you store the kernel there.
Your boot-loader reads the kernel partition and loads the kernel
from there. And of course the boot-loader scans the kernel partition
for bad block. And your boot-loader does not need to scan anything
else. I understand this part.

But what is next? Do you want to tell the kernel to avoid scanning the
kernel partition because boot-loader has already scanned it? Sorry, I
still cannot get the idea...

> I don't have any idea about on-flash BBT.

It is standard mechanism which exists in MTD from early tglx1 times.
MTD can keep BBT on flash, AFAIR, in the last eraseblock. Look for the
NAND_USE_FLASH_BBT constant. And this is the way to go if you want to
optimize BBT scanning, IMO.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-22  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-21  2:53 [PATCH] OneNAND: Runtime badblock check support Kyungmin Park
2009-07-21 10:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-21 11:05   ` Kyungmin Park
2009-07-22  2:39     ` Kyungmin Park
2009-07-22  6:19       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-22  7:11         ` Kyungmin Park
2009-07-22  7:28           ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2009-07-22  7:59             ` Kyungmin Park
2009-07-22  8:12         ` Amit Kumar Sharma
2009-07-22  8:26           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-24 15:31 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-07-24 23:17   ` Kyungmin Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A66BF8D.9010902@gmail.com \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kmpark@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox