Re: [PATCH] [mtd] fixed faulty check

vimal singh
2009-07-30T14:34:48Z

On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Stoyan Gaydarov<sgayda2@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> vimal singh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Sebastian Andrzej
> Siewior<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
>
> vimal singh wrote:
>
>
> What if you go to 'err_out' due to some other error?? Do not you need
> to free 'info'?
>
>
> We have to and of_flash_remove() takes care of it.
>
>
>
>
> Does this mean that the original patch is fine or does it still need the
> kfree? From what i understand when going to err_out it will take care of
> info using of_flash_remove() so then it is not needed in the if check.

Yes.
But I think, you should still correct freeing 'mtd_list' in the label,
when you jump there even before memory gets allocated for that.

-vimal

>
> -Stoyan
>
> that's correct...
>
>
>
> The initial patch would be shorter if
>  dev_set_drvdata(&dev->dev, info);
> would be moved prior the kzalloc()
>
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
>