From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from co203.xi-lite.net ([149.6.83.203]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MZLXa-0008FP-N4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:15:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4A7BF091.5040605@parrot.com> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 11:14:57 +0200 From: Matthieu CASTET MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JiSheng Zhang Subject: Re: [UBI UBIFS] replace vmalloc with kmalloc References: <2df346410908070202i6c16008ckc145559a474129c6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2df346410908070202i6c16008ckc145559a474129c6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "rmk@arm.linux.org.uk" , "adrian.hunter@nokia.com" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , JiSheng Zhang a écrit : > If nandflash driver use DMA to support UBI and UBIFS i/o, there will > be panic like > the following. This is because UBI and UBIFS use vmalloced buffer > somewhere while > nandflash driver put the buffer under DMA and DMA support doesn't like vmalloced > memory. > [ 412.369280] UBIFS: default file-system created > [ 412.374879] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > virtual address 00000000 > [ 412.383177] UBIFS: background thread "ubifs_bgt0_0" started, PID 887 > [ 412.389656] pgd = c0004000 > [ 412.392419] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 > [ 412.396117] Internal error: Oops: 817 [#1] PREEMPT > > Yes, I know kmalloc may fail when memory get fragmented, but I grep the UBI and > UBIFS's source, there are six .c files and seven .c files using > vmalloc, the function > which call vmalloc are all called during the ubi being attached and > the volume being > mounted. In embedded system, this mainly happen during kernel boot, it > should succeed. > > After replacing vmalloc with kmalloc, ubi and ubifs runs fine on my > board. I can alos upload > a patch. > > Comments are welcomed! > mtd is not DMA safe. So patching UBI and UBIFS is not enought. Matthieu