From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from antispam01.maxim-ic.com ([205.153.101.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Mm551-0001ld-5k for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:18:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4AAA4005.9080707@maxim-ic.com> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:48:13 +0530 From: JerinJacob MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com" Subject: Re: UBIFS Error References: <4AA5F37F.4050307@maxim-ic.com> <4AA60E6C.6060307@nokia.com> <4AA8EA9C.4070805@maxim-ic.com> <4AA8ED7B.5020509@nokia.com> <4AA8F6E4.1090209@maxim-ic.com> <4AA90351.3050000@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <4AA90351.3050000@nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "Hunter Adrian \(Nokia-D/Helsinki\)" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On 09/10/2009 03:53 PM, ext JerinJacob wrote: > >> Hi Artem, >> >> Thanks for the support. >> We are using 2.6.30. >> > > And finally, could you please try to reproduce this problem with > nandsim: > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/nand.html#L_nand_nandsim > >>> Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce the problem with nandsim.It works with nansim. However i couldn't test with 1GiB nandsim as it needs 1GiB ram.Tested with 512MiB nandsim. I guess it is a could be data corruption either in platform specific driver or ubifs. Is there any way we can validate the platform specific nand driver ? Please let me know your views on this? Actually we are in the process of migrating from yaffs to ubifs, The same test application works with yaffs as well.