From: JerinJacob <jerin.jacob@maxim-ic.com>
To: "dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: "Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com" <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Hunter Adrian \(Nokia-D/Helsinki\)" <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: UBIFS Error
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 13:58:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AAF5016.2030809@maxim-ic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252938588.5060.103.camel@localhost>
I've created this piece of documentation for you:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/general.html#L_mtd_tests
Please, validate your flash driver/HW.
>> Got a crash while reading a large mtd device with "mtd_readtest".
Let me fix this platform specific driver bug.
Any way this mtd_tests are very use full.
And here is the text in case someone would review it:
>> you may add how to run the test.
>> modprobe mtd_readtest dev=6 ; rmmod mtd_readtest
Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:27 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
>>>> And finally, could you please try to reproduce this problem with
>>>> nandsim:
>>>> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/nand.html#L_nand_nandsim
>>>>
>>>>
>>> >>> Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce the problem with nandsim.It
>>> works with nansim.
>>> However i couldn't test with 1GiB nandsim as it needs 1GiB ram.Tested
>>> with 512MiB nandsim.
>>>
>>> I guess it is a could be data corruption either in platform specific
>>> driver or ubifs.
>>> Is there any way we can validate the platform specific nand driver ?
>>> Please let me know your views on this?
>>>
>>> Actually we are in the process of migrating from yaffs to ubifs, The
>>> same test application works with
>>> yaffs as well.
>>>
>> I've created this piece of documentation for you:
>> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/general.html#L_mtd_tests
>>
>> Please, validate your flash driver/HW.
>>
>
> And here is the text in case someone would review it:
>
> The MTD subsystem includes a set of tests which you may run to verify
> your flash hardware and drivers. The tests are available in the mainline
> kernels starting from kernel version 2.6.29 and they live in the
> drivers/mtd/tests directory of the linux kernel source codes. You may
> compile the tests as kernel modules by enabling them in the kernel
> configuration menu by marking: "Device Drivers" -> "Memory Technology
> Devices (MTD)" -> "MTD tests support" (or the MTD_TESTS symbol in
> the .config file).
>
> If you have a pre-2.6.29 kernel, you may find the tests here:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/ahunter/nand-tests.git
>
> The MTD test-suite contains the following tests:
>
> * mtd_speedtest: measures and reports read/write/erase speed of
> the MTD device.
> * mtd_stresstest: performs random read/write/erase operations and
> validates the MTD device I/O capabilities.
> * mtd_readtest: this tests reads whole MTD device, one NAND page
> at a time including OOB (or 512 bytes at a time in case of
> flashes like NOR) and checks that reading works properly.
> * mtd_pagetest: relevant only for NAND flashes, tests NAND page
> writing and reading in different sizes and order; this test was
> originally developed for testing the OneNAND driver, so it might
> be a little OneNAND-oriented, but must work on any NAND flash.
> * mtd_oobtest: relevant only for NAND flashes, tests that the OOB
> area I/O works properly by writing data to different offsets and
> verifying it.
> * mtd_subpagetest: relevant only for NAND flashes, tests sub-page
> I/O.
> * mtd_torturetest: this test is designed to wear out flash
> eraseblocks. It repeatedly writes and erases the same group of
> eraseblocks until an I/O error happens, so be careful! The test
> supports a number of options (see modinfo mtd_torturetest) which
> allow you to set the amount of eraseblocks to torture and how
> the torturing is done. You may limit the amount of torturing
> cycles using the cycles_count module parameter. It may be very
> god idea to run this test for some time and validate your flash
> driver and HW, providing you have a spare device. For example,
> we caught rather rare and nasty DMA issues on an OMAP2 board
> with OneNAND flash, just by running this tests for few hours.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-15 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-08 6:02 UBIFS Error JerinJacob
2009-09-08 7:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-09-08 12:16 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-10 12:01 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-10 12:13 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-10 12:53 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-10 13:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-10 14:22 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-11 12:18 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-14 14:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-14 14:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-15 8:28 ` JerinJacob [this message]
2009-09-17 8:38 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-28 11:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-29 5:48 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-30 5:37 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-09-14 15:07 ` JerinJacob
2009-09-14 15:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4AAF5016.2030809@maxim-ic.com \
--to=jerin.jacob@maxim-ic.com \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).