From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.105.134] helo=mgw-mx09.nokia.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MxHdP-0002bY-MM for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:56:11 +0000 Message-ID: <4AD2FD26.9010403@nokia.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:55:50 +0300 From: Mika Korhonen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bityutskiy Artem (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Revised: MTD: OneNAND: multiblock erase support References: <1254819360-17191-1-git-send-email-ext-mika.2.korhonen@nokia.com> <1255260331.16942.37.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1255260331.16942.37.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "amul.saha@samsung.com" , "kyungmin.park@samsung.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "Hunter Adrian \(Nokia-D/Helsinki\)" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Bityutskiy Artem (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:55 +0300, Mika Korhonen wrote: > >> This patch series is a reworked version of >> >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027138.html >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027139.html >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-September/027140.html >> >> based on comments by Adrian Hunter and Kyungmin Park. This version should >> address the issues pointed out by them and apply on the current mtd tree. >> >> The original patch is: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2009-June/026130.html >> >> I split the original patch in two for readability: the first part extracts >> the execution of erase command to a separate function for easier integration >> of different erase method. The second part implements the multiblock erase >> function in case multiple blocks are requested to be erased and the chip is >> not Flex. >> >> This is useful for flashing applications that need to do their work as >> fast as possible. For full 64 eraseblock case the erase speed is up to 30x >> faster. (Samsung: 64 MB/s vs 2.1 GB/s, I got 1.4 GB/s on Linux kernel) >> > > Mika, I've tried to apply your patches to my tree, but they do not apply > any more because of recent printk cleanups: > > http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/commit/297758f8fc4e92b1915d2f5f2f84cedfe8941e5a > > Could you please refresh your patches against the current MTD tree and > re-send? > There you are, I just resent them. br, Mika