From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.37]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1N0ULs-0006MS-6o for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 06:07:20 +0000 Received: from mail3.aimsys.nl (a80-127-156-242.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.156.242]) by smtp-vbr17.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9L67DLk025334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:07:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl) Message-ID: <4ADEA511.4080307@aimvalley.nl> Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:07:13 +0200 From: Norbert van Bolhuis MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Mtd List Subject: Re: should/can we do ubidetach on reboot References: <4ADDDF57.4050602@aimvalley.nl> In-Reply-To: <4ADDDF57.4050602@aimvalley.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Norbert van Bolhuis wrote: > > I guess it's safe/normal to detach an MTD device from UBI before > rebooting ? > > I'm asking because detaching is the only way to shut down the UBI > background task (ubi_bgt0d). I do not want this task to start a flash erase > operation or whatsoever just before the actual reboot takes place. > > > Oh, I miss "[PATCH] MTD: Add UBI reboot notifier". This solves the problem.