From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1N639r-0006ab-GL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:17:56 +0000 Received: from mail3.aimsys.nl (a80-127-156-242.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.156.242]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nA5EHbxb090654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:17:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl) Message-ID: <4AF2DE80.5010808@aimvalley.nl> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:17:36 +0100 From: Norbert van Bolhuis MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: can UBIFS be NFS exported Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , just to make sure. UBIFS can not be NFS exported, is this correct ? (I need NFS in our distributed system. The server uses UBIFS. But there is a ISO9660 image on our UBIFS and fortunately ISO(Z)FS can be NFS exported, so it's not a problem)