From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ipmail02.adl6.internode.on.net ([203.16.214.140]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NG4oT-0007wD-IL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:05:22 +0000 Received: from [192.168.14.33] ([192.168.14.33]) (authenticated user iwo@call-direct.com.au) by mail.call-direct.com.au (Kerio MailServer 6.7.0) for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:58:55 +1100 Message-ID: <4B17550A.7010409@call-direct.com.au> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:04:58 +1100 From: Iwo Mergler MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux MTD Subject: Re: Looks like a UBIFS bug... - Solved References: <4B173CEB.5050103@call-direct.com.au> <4B173FC4.5020901@call-direct.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4B173FC4.5020901@call-direct.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Iwo Mergler wrote: > Iwo Mergler wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've got some weird UBIFS-related behaviour. I'd welcome >> any suggestions. >> Turns out that the same script that was erasing the partition, creating ubifs, etc. was invoked a second time in the background. I can't blame UBIFS for not surviving some random FLASH erasure during operation. :-) Sorry about the noise. Iwo