From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4B991A6F.1080006@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:29:35 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Levitsky Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mtd/nand/r852: fix build for CONFIG_PM=n References: <20100301210210.c6f465e6.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4B8C378B.2090400@oracle.com> <1267531329.10734.1.camel@maxim-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1267531329.10734.1.camel@maxim-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Rothwell , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 03/02/10 04:02, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 13:54 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> Fix r852 build for the case of CONFIG_PM=n. >> >> drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1039: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_prepare_to_sleep' >> drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c:1048: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_back_from_sleep' >> >> This patch leaves r852_pm_ops untouched. >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> Cc: Maxim Levitsky >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >> Cc: David Woodhouse >> --- >> drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> --- linux-next-20100301.orig/drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c >> +++ linux-next-20100301/drivers/mtd/nand/r852.c >> @@ -1007,6 +1007,7 @@ void r852_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pci_d >> pci_disable_device(pci_dev); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM >> int r852_suspend(struct device *device) >> { >> struct r852_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(to_pci_dev(device)); >> @@ -1081,6 +1082,10 @@ int r852_resume(struct device *device) >> r852_update_card_detect(dev); >> return 0; >> } >> +#else >> +#define r852_suspend NULL >> +#define r852_resume NULL >> +#endif >> >> static const struct pci_device_id r852_pci_id_tbl[] = { >> >> > oops, I forgot about that case again.. > Acked-by: Maxim Levitsky Ping. can we get this added to linux-next, please? -- ~Randy