From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OKBeP-0004xf-CE for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:44:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4C07BFB0.2060107@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:44:00 +0200 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: Do we remove from jedec_probe.c? References: <20100526175320.GD24167@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20100526175320.GD24167@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, On 26.05.2010 19:53, Wolfram Sang wrote: > now that Guillaume introduced cfi-support for some SST-flashes, I wonder if > those can be removed from jedec_probe.c? Or should they stay for > backward-compatibility? > The userspace flashrom utility is getting support for those big SST NOR flashes soon, so depending on whether you want these chips to host a file system, flashrom may be an option. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/