From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11])
	by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1OQJKw-0007JQ-En
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:09:19 +0000
Message-ID: <4C1E07D1.4090703@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 20:21:37 +0800
From: "stanley.miao" <stanley.miao@windriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Fix mtd-utils bugs
References: <1276248975-1822-1-git-send-email-stanley.miao@windriver.com>	
	<1276422718.19028.211.camel@localhost>	
	<1276424048.19028.217.camel@localhost>
	<4C1B2B65.3090606@windriver.com>
	<1276856663.19028.447.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1276856663.19028.447.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 16:16 +0800, stanley.miao wrote:
>   
>> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>     
>>> On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 12:51 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:36 +0800, Stanley.Miao wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Please, make sure your submissions have proper version. I have limited
>>>> amount of time and do not want to spend it figuring out which patch is
>>>> the latest. Use the best kernel practices and apply prefix your stuff
>>>> with [PATCHv3] or something like that.
>>>>
>>>> Could you please re-submit your latest version?
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Also, it is nice to put a short changelog, but I can live without it.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Is the subject of every emails is the short changelog you wanted ?
>>     
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I do not understand the question. I do not need changelogs. I
> just noted that there are best practices, and people use changelogs. You
> can take a look at lkml archives at patch series from good kernel
> hackers for example.
>
> If you asked whether the changelog should be in each patch - no, just in
> the "0" patch, and just short.
>   

Oh, Got it. I misunderstood the "short changelog" previously.
I have sent the V3.

Thanks
Stanley.
> Anyway, I just want you to re-send your up-to-date patches as a separate
> series with a v2 prefix.
>
>