From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mms1.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.17]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1OmZ8Z-0006mr-Oz for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:28:32 +0000 Message-ID: <4C6EF36F.2080306@broadcom.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 14:28:15 -0700 From: "Brian Norris" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David Woodhouse" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: nand: Increase NAND_MAX_OOBSIZE References: <1282332973-12077-1-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> <1282332973-12077-2-git-send-email-norris@broadcom.com> <1282333385.25239.88.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1282333385.25239.88.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kevin Cernekee , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Brian Norris , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/20/2010 12:43 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 12:36 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: >> An increase in NAND_MAX_OOBSIZE and NAND_MAX_PAGESIZE is necessary >> in order to support many new chips. Among those: >> >> Toshiba TC58TxG4S2FBAxx 8KB page, 576B OOB >> Micron MT29F64G08CBAAA 8KB page, 448B OOB > > Ick, don't we have a better fix for this in the works? > For the MAX macros? I have no idea. There were comments there telling me to do this whenever newer chips are supported.