From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Alexander Kurz <linux@kbdbabel.org>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Michael Roth <mroth@nessie.de>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
vamos-dev@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>, Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>,
linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@codesourcery.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christian Dietrich <qy03fugy@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Removing dead code
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:14:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C7757B1.9060403@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimiLhhTW=XRD4hSdsKxnNdKaMSDLUgOeVR=SCJf@mail.gmail.com>
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:07, Christian Dietrich
> <qy03fugy@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
>> Christian Dietrich <qy03fugy@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
>>>> I don't have any problems with any of these from a
>>>> m68knommu point of view. I can merge them via the
>>>> m68knommu git tree if you want?
>>> If there aren't any complaints from the m68k people i'm fine with
>>> that.
>> Hm, last message was two weeks ago, so perhaps the m68k people (with
>> mmu) have no complaints with these patches and they can be included in
>> the m68knommu tree?
>
> Sorry, I've been a bit too busy with other things...
>
> - arch/m68k: Removing dead GG2 config option
> Fine for me
> - arch/m68k{,nommu}: Removing dead SMP config option
> Are there any SMP m68k systems coming?
> If yes, we may want to keep it. From the other hand, probably many
> other places
> need adjustment for SMP too, so the few checks for CONFIG_SMP may give a
> false feeling of readiness for SMP.
> - arch/m68knommu: Removing dead M68KFPU_EMU config option
> With the imminent(?) merge of mmu and nommu, perhaps we want to keep it?
I think what is in there is so old and decrepit that it is more
of a hindrance than a help :-) When we merge we should just be
using what is currently in the m68k part of the source. So I am
happy to remove the m68knommu FPU code right now.
Regards
Greg
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-27 6:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 12:41 [PATCH 0/9] Removing dead code Christian Dietrich
2010-08-04 12:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] Removing dead CONFIG_RPX(LITE|CLASSIC) Christian Dietrich
2010-08-09 5:50 ` [PATCH 0/9] Removing dead code Greg Ungerer
2010-08-09 9:03 ` Christian Dietrich
2010-08-23 10:07 ` Christian Dietrich
2010-08-23 14:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-08-27 6:14 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2010-08-27 7:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C7757B1.9060403@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=linux@kbdbabel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=manuel.lauss@gmail.com \
--cc=maxim@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mroth@nessie.de \
--cc=qy03fugy@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sammy@sammy.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=smaclennan@pikatech.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vamos-dev@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).