From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by bombadil.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P0w2h-0001Si-8M for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:45:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4CA334FA.2080707@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:45:46 +0200 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [RFC] Online firmware upgrade in non-embedded systems References: <1285696787.2282.45.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> <4CA26F35.6060408@gmx.net> <1285763700.2283.6.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> In-Reply-To: <1285763700.2283.6.camel@achroite.uk.solarflarecom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , sf-linux-drivers , linux-mtd , linux-kernel , flashrom List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 29.09.2010 14:35, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 00:41 +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> [adding flashrom@flashrom.org to CC, senders will be whitelisted after a >> short delay] >> >> On 28.09.2010 19:59, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> >>> Network and disk controllers normally have at least some firmware in >>> flash to support their use as boot devices. [...] >>> >>> >> Given that the flashrom utility (GPLv2) >> supports flashing many network cards, SATA/PATA controllers, graphics >> cards, and of course the main system firmware/BIOS/EFI, and it does that >> from userspace without any kernel support, >> > [...] > > I'm looking for a clean solution, not a hack. > What would qualify as a clean solution? And is cross-platform code one of your goals? Regards, Carl-Daniel