From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ew0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PJ3KG-00028t-99 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 12:10:53 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1839015ewy.36 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:10:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4CE5175C.2080505@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:09:00 +0300 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Savinay Dharmappa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: NOR flash driver for OMAP-L137/AM17x References: <1289548911-21243-1-git-send-email-savinay.dharmappa@ti.com> <4CE50C64.60001@mvista.com> <003c01cb8716$ce4bb750$6ae325f0$@dharmappa@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <003c01cb8716$ce4bb750$6ae325f0$@dharmappa@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amakarov@ru.mvista.com, davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, 'David Griego' List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello. On 18-11-2010 14:50, Savinay Dharmappa wrote: >>> OMAP-L137/AM17x has limited number of dedicated EMIFA >>> address pins, enough to interface directly to an SDRAM. >>> If a device such as an asynchronous flash needs to be >>> attached to the EMIFA, then either GPIO pins or a chip >>> select may be used to control the flash device's upper >>> address lines. >>> This patch adds support for the NOR flash on the OMAP-L137/ >>> AM17x user interface daughter board using the latch-addr-flash >>> MTD mapping driver which allows flashes to be partially >>> physically addressed. The upper address lines are set by >>> a board specific code which is a separate patch. >> Please add back my signoff, omitted in this version. Some of the code, >> including a bug fix, was authored by me. > I'll surely do this. What about your Sign-off on 2/2 patch? Already replied. > Also shall I add > Aleksey's Sign-off on this patch AFAIR, there was his signoff on it, so yes. > and David's Sign-off on 2/2 patch? David didn't touch patch 2/2. > Thanks, > Savinay. WBR, Sergei