From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1PzP6n-00071b-18 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:56:01 +0000 Received: by bwz1 with SMTP id 1so342517bwz.36 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4D7F1B8C.2080303@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 08:55:56 +0100 From: Andre Naujoks MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthieu CASTET Subject: Re: gcc 4.5 and copy_flag in libubigen.c References: <4D7E4437.70300@googlemail.com> <4D7E5601.6090905@parrot.com> In-Reply-To: <4D7E5601.6090905@parrot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am 14.03.2011 18:53, schrieb Matthieu CASTET: > Andre Naujoks a écrit : >> Hi all. >> >> I am compiling a board support package with mtd-utils-1.3.1. >> > Why don't you update your mtd-utils version ? Because it would be more of a hassle and a risk to do that. There are patches applied that were build from the suppliers of the BSP, which I would have to possibly reproduce for a newer version. As far as I can see, they are all patches to the build system, but nevertheless. The current version is the version I would stick to just because it takes the maintenance of the package of of me. I would rather add a little patch myself instead of handling the whole package. I additionally have no idea about the implications an update of this particular package would have. It just broke, because the gcc people decided a new warning was a good idea. Andre > > > Matthieu