From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4D95D517.30002@atmel.com> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:37:27 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dedekind1@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MTD/atmel_nand: Fix support for CPUs that do not support DMA access References: <1301473601-29570-1-git-send-email-hong.xu@atmel.com> <1301473601-29570-3-git-send-email-hong.xu@atmel.com> <1301662470.2789.59.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1301662470.2789.59.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Hong Xu , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 01/04/2011 14:54, Artem Bityutskiy : > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 16:26 +0800, Hong Xu wrote: >> use_dma was always "1" even if the CPU does not support DMA >> >> Tested on AT91SAM9261EK by Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> >> Reported-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu > > Pushed to l2-mtd-2.6.git tree. This looks like a candidate for the > stable tree - should it be sent there? Well, definitively the whole series is a candidate for .39-xx (also with the "[PATCH] MTD: atmel_nand: Fall back to CPU I/O when buffer is in vmalloc(ed) region" that follows. But, as DMA access was not included in .38, stable tree should not be impacted. Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre