* jffs2 help
@ 2011-05-03 16:31 angelo
2011-05-04 7:15 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-05-04 7:20 ` R: " Bosi Daniele
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: angelo @ 2011-05-03 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
hi all,
i have a specific issue that seems realted to jffs2,
i tried to subscribe to jffs2-dev list but seems no more existing.
Just a suggestion, is there some jffs2 list/support still alive from
Axis ? Is jffs2 the right way to go to store some non volatile data to a
nor flash or is it better i move directly to UBIFS ?
thanks,
angelo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: jffs2 help
2011-05-03 16:31 jffs2 help angelo
@ 2011-05-04 7:15 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-05-04 7:20 ` R: " Bosi Daniele
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ricard Wanderlof @ 2011-05-04 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angelo; +Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
On Tue, 3 May 2011, angelo wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i have a specific issue that seems realted to jffs2,
> i tried to subscribe to jffs2-dev list but seems no more existing.
>
> Just a suggestion, is there some jffs2 list/support still alive from
> Axis ?
Axis pioneered the development of the original JFFS, but did not drive the
development of JFFS2, and so there is no active support from Axis for
either file system, and hasn't been for many years.
The right place to ask for JFFS2 help is on the linux-mtd mailing list,
i.e. right here.
> Is jffs2 the right way to go to store some non volatile data to a nor
> flash or is it better i move directly to UBIFS ?
I leave that one up to others, but basically I think the take is this:
ubifs resides on top of UBI, which works with both NOR and NAND flashes,
but several of the features that UBI brings (transparent bad block
management and bit scrubbing) are primarily intended to cover up the
deficiencies of NAND flash. On the other hand, the whole logical volume
concept which is also a feature of UBI is useful for any type of flash.
ubifs seems to mount faster, I think because it doesn't scan the whole
flash at mount time like JFFS2 does, although I seem to recall there's an
option to store summary info on the flash rather than built it at mount
time. Not to sure exactly the various permutations here though.
In more general terms, jffs2 is pretty stable, on the other hand, there's
not much maintentence going on either; the main work goes into UBI and
ubifs, so the that's where the real development is.
/Ricard
--
Ricard Wolf Wanderlöf ricardw(at)axis.com
Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden www.axis.com
Phone +46 46 272 2016 Fax +46 46 13 61 30
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* R: jffs2 help
2011-05-03 16:31 jffs2 help angelo
2011-05-04 7:15 ` Ricard Wanderlof
@ 2011-05-04 7:20 ` Bosi Daniele
2011-05-04 9:22 ` angelo
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bosi Daniele @ 2011-05-04 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'angelo', linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Angelo,
I suggest you to start using ubi.
Take a look to the following Free-electrons document to see a benchmark of flash file systems
http://free-electrons.com/doc/flash-filesystems.pdf
BTW on Free electron site you can find a lot of helpful documentation, take a look on it.
Bye Daniele
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org] Per conto di angelo
Inviato: martedì 3 maggio 2011 18.32
A: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Oggetto: jffs2 help
hi all,
i have a specific issue that seems realted to jffs2,
i tried to subscribe to jffs2-dev list but seems no more existing.
Just a suggestion, is there some jffs2 list/support still alive from
Axis ? Is jffs2 the right way to go to store some non volatile data to a
nor flash or is it better i move directly to UBIFS ?
thanks,
angelo
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: R: jffs2 help
2011-05-04 7:20 ` R: " Bosi Daniele
@ 2011-05-04 9:22 ` angelo
2011-05-04 9:26 ` Ricard Wanderlof
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: angelo @ 2011-05-04 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Hi Daniele and Ricard,
thanks both for the help.
The free-electrons site is really a wonderful help. I couldn't find it
out through googling "mtd jffs2" still.
Anyway, still, following strictly the site help, i can eraseall, mount
jffs2, write some files, unmount, but at the next mount nothing is still
there. Option -o sync doesn't help also.
Writing files, i still get errors like
Node totlen on flash (0xffffffff) != totlen from node (0x0000000c)
I probably will move to UBIFS, but before i would like to understand why
jffs2, that should be reliable in anyway, is failing on my flash.
Regards,
angelo
On 04/05/2011 09:20, Bosi Daniele wrote:
> Angelo,
> I suggest you to start using ubi.
> Take a look to the following Free-electrons document to see a benchmark of flash file systems
>
> http://free-electrons.com/doc/flash-filesystems.pdf
>
> BTW on Free electron site you can find a lot of helpful documentation, take a look on it.
>
> Bye Daniele
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org [mailto:linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org] Per conto di angelo
> Inviato: martedì 3 maggio 2011 18.32
> A: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
> Oggetto: jffs2 help
>
> hi all,
>
> i have a specific issue that seems realted to jffs2,
> i tried to subscribe to jffs2-dev list but seems no more existing.
>
> Just a suggestion, is there some jffs2 list/support still alive from
> Axis ? Is jffs2 the right way to go to store some non volatile data to a
> nor flash or is it better i move directly to UBIFS ?
>
> thanks,
> angelo
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
>
<http://www.sysam.it>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: R: jffs2 help
2011-05-04 9:22 ` angelo
@ 2011-05-04 9:26 ` Ricard Wanderlof
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ricard Wanderlof @ 2011-05-04 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: angelo; +Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
On Wed, 4 May 2011, angelo wrote:
> The free-electrons site is really a wonderful help. I couldn't find it
> out through googling "mtd jffs2" still.
>
> Anyway, still, following strictly the site help, i can eraseall, mount
> jffs2, write some files, unmount, but at the next mount nothing is still
> there. Option -o sync doesn't help also.
> Writing files, i still get errors like
>
> Node totlen on flash (0xffffffff) != totlen from node (0x0000000c)
>
> I probably will move to UBIFS, but before i would like to understand why
> jffs2, that should be reliable in anyway, is failing on my flash.
I agree, if you cannot get jffs2 to work, there must be something that's
not configured properly.
Reliability is one thing, but short term for tests like this any problems
you encounter are not due to failing bits in the flash etc but some sort
of misconfiguration or bug.
/Ricard
--
Ricard Wolf Wanderlöf ricardw(at)axis.com
Axis Communications AB, Lund, Sweden www.axis.com
Phone +46 46 272 2016 Fax +46 46 13 61 30
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-04 9:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-03 16:31 jffs2 help angelo
2011-05-04 7:15 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-05-04 7:20 ` R: " Bosi Daniele
2011-05-04 9:22 ` angelo
2011-05-04 9:26 ` Ricard Wanderlof
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox