From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QJiJH-0008QJ-A1 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 May 2011 08:28:52 +0000 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so5663244wyb.36 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 01:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC8F73A.1070708@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 10:28:42 +0200 From: angelo MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-net@vger-kernel.org, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Coldfire, d9000e and patch RFC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: uClinux development list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi all, some months ago i posted to these lists (net, m68k) a patch. http://marc.info/?l=linux-m68k&m=129447772217552&w=2 I did a small job to allow dm9000e to be used with a Coldfire processor, and for the functional point of view the patch works fine. I never get the patch approved or a reply to this PATCH V.3 with the reason that explain why cannot be approved, but i am really interested that this job don't remain to me only, some other could need the ability to use the dm9000e chip, a quiet old but very cheap component, with Coldfire. The patch should probably be reworked in a different way, please let me know if i have to arrange the code in a different way, of if some other information are needed. Regards, Angelo Dureghello