From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E1DAD1E.4090706@ru.mvista.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:35:10 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lei Wen Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4] MTD: pxa3xx_nand: convert all printk into dev_* References: <1310466535-15287-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <1310481336-13230-3-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com> <4E1D7A1E.1020802@mvista.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Miao , David Woodhouse , Sergei Shtylyov , Artem Bityutskiy , Lei Wen , Yu Tang , Haojian Zhuang , Daniel Mack , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Igor Grinberg , linux-arm-kernel List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello. Lei Wen wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Lei Wen >>> --- >>> drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- >>> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> index 1efecf7..afe14bd 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c >> [...] >>> @@ -774,11 +774,15 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_config_flash(struct >>> pxa3xx_nand_info *info, >>> struct pxa3xx_nand_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data; >>> uint32_t ndcr = 0x0; /* enable all interrupts */ >>> >>> - if (f->page_size != 2048 && f->page_size != 512) >>> + if (f->page_size != 2048 && f->page_size != 512) { >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Current only support 2048 and 512 >>> size\n"); >>> return -EINVAL; >>> + } >>> >>> - if (f->flash_width != 16 && f->flash_width != 8) >>> + if (f->flash_width != 16 && f->flash_width != 8) { >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Only support 8bit and 16 bit!\n"); >> So this patch not only converts printk() to dev_*() calls, it also adds >> some dev_err() calls? This should have been mentioned in the change long at >> least... > What do you mean by "chang long"? Do you mean the cover letter or the > patch name? I mean the patch description (which in this patch is missing). > Certainly it is a good suggest to show it in the change version list. Don't quite understand what you mean here... > Best regards, > Lei WBR, Sergei