From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([88.190.12.23]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QmNFv-0000aG-6A for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:51:52 +0000 Message-ID: <4E3131AE.7010408@free-electrons.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:53:50 +0200 From: David Wagner MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Embedded Subject: Flash filesystems benchmarks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tim.bird@am.sony.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, As a contract with the CELF, we (Free Electrons) developed a flash filesystem benchmarking suite ; it tests ubifs, jffs2, yaffs2 and squashfs(over UBI+two different block transition layers). It has been run on a Calao USB-9263 board and a IGEPv2 board and on 2.6.38, .39 and 3.0 kernels. The results are shown as histograms and two different reportings exists: * filesystem comparison for a given board/kernel couple * kernel comparison for a given board/filesystem couple All the details are to be found at: http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks Direct link to the test protocol: http://elinux.org/Flash_Filesystem_Benchmarks_Protocol Link to the gitorious page: https://gitorious.org/ffs-benchmarks/ffs-benchmarks Reviews of the test protocol, pointers to incoherent results or any other comment is welcome. We will keep posting more results. David Wagner -- David Wagner, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com