From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4E40D668.6060907@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 14:40:40 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Koen Beel Subject: Re: GPMI-NAND Status? References: <20110805135133.GA26981@pengutronix.de> <4E3F8087.6070206@freescale.com> <4E40C18B.7040609@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Frank LI , Wolfram Sang , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Shawn Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lothar_Wa=DFmann?= List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Huang Shijie wrote: >> Hi Koen: >>> Anything is good for me. >>> Could also be useful to make sure we test on the same HW as much as >>> possible and are using the same source tree. >>> HW I have: >>> - mx23evk rev C1 >>> - mx23evk rev B2 >>> - own target hw using mx23 lqfp-128 chip and different type of ddr and >>> nand. >>> >> My test mx23 board is 169BGA package which is different from yours. >> >> Could you get the 169BGA package board? >> >> I think the DMA timeout is caused by the different package type. > I suppose my mx23evk is right the same as you have (same revision) and > this has the bga169 package. My actual target has lqfp128. But on both > boards I get the same issues. Could you test my kernel in your side? I can provide you the sd_loader, kernel. You can use SD card to store the rootfs. Best Regards Huang Shijie > So I don't think the package type has something to do with the dma > timeout issue. After all the silicon inside is the same thing. > > I'm trying to debug a little further. > > Regards, > Koen > >> Best Regards >> Huang Shijie >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >