From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F27AA98.2090602@freescale.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:47:20 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support References: <1327898174-13656-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120130094610.GA15596@pengutronix.de> <4F2671C3.6000809@freescale.com> <20120130104428.GB15596@pengutronix.de> <4F267F21.1030204@freescale.com> <20120130114131.GC15596@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120130114131.GC15596@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marek Vasut , artem.bityutskiy@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , hi, > CCing Marek, he can say more about the U-Boot side probably... > >>> Bootloaders may also need to write to NAND. So, they need to share the >> Do you mean the uboot may write something to the NAND? >> Could you show me some more detail cases? > U-Boot has NAND support in mainline, for barebox it is work-in-progress. > Both can and do write to NAND (kernel, rootfs), because both have > established procedures to do so (and maybe don't want to rely on > third-party tools like kobs-ng). > ok. What's about to add a module_param() to enable/disable the BBT for GPMI? What's your suggestion? Br Huang Shijie