public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH
@ 2012-01-31 12:10 Wolfram Sang
  2012-01-31 17:42 ` Brian Norris
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2012-01-31 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd; +Cc: Huang Shijie, Wolfram Sang, Artem Bityutskiy

This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
decides according to that.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
---

Artem: NAND_OWN_BUFFERS should not get set, so no danger. But I'd think we
should add the stable tag nonetheless if Huang is fine with this change.

 drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
index 493ec2f..f39f83e 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
@@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int gpmi_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
 		chip->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1);
 
 	/* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */
-	if (chip->options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
+	if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
 		ret = nand_update_bbt(mtd, ofs);
 	else {
 		chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift);
-- 
1.7.8.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH
  2012-01-31 12:10 [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Wolfram Sang
@ 2012-01-31 17:42 ` Brian Norris
  2012-02-01  2:18 ` Huang Shijie
  2012-02-03  6:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2012-01-31 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: Huang Shijie, linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
> currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
> decides according to that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
> ---
>
> Artem: NAND_OWN_BUFFERS should not get set, so no danger. But I'd think we
> should add the stable tag nonetheless if Huang is fine with this change.

Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

And the "stable" tag is probably good, since the "options" ->
"bbt_options" split was a few releases ago. I guess I missed this one.

Also, you might note that there are some changes in progress with the
default NAND "block_markbad" routine, which you may or may not want to
reflect in the overriding "gpmi_block_markbad" routine eventually.

Brian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH
  2012-01-31 12:10 [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Wolfram Sang
  2012-01-31 17:42 ` Brian Norris
@ 2012-02-01  2:18 ` Huang Shijie
  2012-02-03  6:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Huang Shijie @ 2012-02-01  2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: linux-mtd, Artem Bityutskiy

于 2012年01月31日 20:10, Wolfram Sang 写道:
> This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
> currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
> decides according to that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
> ---
>
> Artem: NAND_OWN_BUFFERS should not get set, so no danger. But I'd think we
> should add the stable tag nonetheless if Huang is fine with this change.
>
>  drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> index 493ec2f..f39f83e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> @@ -1124,7 +1124,7 @@ static int gpmi_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
>  		chip->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1);
>  
>  	/* Do we have a flash based bad block table ? */
> -	if (chip->options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
> +	if (chip->bbt_options & NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH)
>  		ret = nand_update_bbt(mtd, ofs);
>  	else {
>  		chipnr = (int)(ofs >> chip->chip_shift);
Acked-by: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>


I noticed this too.

thanks a lot.

Huang Shijie

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH
  2012-01-31 12:10 [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Wolfram Sang
  2012-01-31 17:42 ` Brian Norris
  2012-02-01  2:18 ` Huang Shijie
@ 2012-02-03  6:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-02-03  6:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wolfram Sang; +Cc: Huang Shijie, linux-mtd

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 454 bytes --]

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 13:10 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This has been moved from .options to .bbt_options meanwhile. So, it
> currently checks for something totally different (NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) and
> decides according to that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>

Pushed to l2-mtd.git, added the following tag:
Cc: stable@kernel.org [3.2+]

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-03  6:28 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-31 12:10 [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: use correct member for checking NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH Wolfram Sang
2012-01-31 17:42 ` Brian Norris
2012-02-01  2:18 ` Huang Shijie
2012-02-03  6:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox