From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4F3C6C22.2010003@freescale.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:38:26 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add gpmi support for mx6q References: <1328505606-27981-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120215183720.GA2399@r65073-Latitude-D630> <4F3C623A.3000301@freescale.com> <20120216021841.GG30946@r65073-Latitude-D630> In-Reply-To: <20120216021841.GG30946@r65073-Latitude-D630> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: artem.bityutskiy@intel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:56:10AM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote: >> Hi, >>> The imx6q only supports DT boot, but I do not see you are adding DT >>> probe for the driver, so I'm wondering how you tested the driver on >>> imx6q. >>> >> This patch is just the first patch for mx6q. My following patches will >> add DT to the gpmi nand driver for mx6q. Due to the dependency >> issue, I will send the patches >> in the following order: >> [1] mtd/gpmi: add gpmi support for mx6q. >> [2] [PATCH v5] patch set about the MXS-DMA >> [3] add DT support to gpmi for mx6q. >> > It should be: > > 1. MXS-DMA series > 2. Add imx6q support with DT probe > I ever did so in this order. But the mxs-dma series delayed for long time( I missed the CCs). But Artem's tree is faster to merge patch. >> I tested this patch based on our bsp code. >> > This is wrong approach. You are submitting patches to mainline, so > you should test your patches on mainline tree. > Beside the DT, the gpmi nand driver is the same. Is the mainline tree ready now? How can i to set the pinmux for gpmi? BR Huang Shijie