From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hd5b91d02.k46641.sta.perspektivbredband.net ([213.185.29.2] helo=fg-dc1.flatfrog.local) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1S4T35-0008Ds-4p for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 08:13:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4F5475A8.3050600@flatfrog.com> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:13:28 +0100 From: Orjan Friberg MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grazvydas Ignotas , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Spurious ECC errors with mtd_subpagetest (OMAP3, NAND) References: <4F50F2AB.10209@flatfrog.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 03/02/2012 06:17 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > IIRC NAND in mainline was broken for very long time on OMAP3, I think > it was only fixed in 2.6.39.1. That seems to be the case; the 2.6.39.1 diff contains the OMAP NAND sub page write fix (applied locally). Anyone else who can testify on the "volatile-ness" of NAND ECC errors? I.e., are they expected to be more persistent? Thanks, Orjan -- Orjan Friberg FlatFrog Laboratories AB