From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SKSRG-0002Ts-Kh for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:48:43 +0000 Received: by lagy4 with SMTP id y4so6345356lag.36 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F8E9C04.1090105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:48:36 +0600 From: Alexey Galakhov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22DEGETEL_-_DONNETTE=2C_Beno=EEt=22?= , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: S5PC100/S5PV210 NAND controller support References: <4F8E8AE0.2020603@gmail.com> <9E63AD4284D3A34EB555C5876F86F895349812D26A@BT1FMSGS11.bt0d0000.w2k.bouyguestelecom.fr> In-Reply-To: <9E63AD4284D3A34EB555C5876F86F895349812D26A@BT1FMSGS11.bt0d0000.w2k.bouyguestelecom.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , By reading S5PV210 datasheet I discovered that its NAND controller is very similar to the one of S3C2410. The former is already supported well. Looks that there's no need for a new separate driver, provided that the old one is aware of S5Pxxx chips. -- Alex On 18.04.2012 16:02, DEGETEL - DONNETTE, Benoît wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if they should go through staging at first, should they not ? The patch isn't present in 3.3.2 for the moment. > > B. Donnette