From: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
To: artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com
Cc: Ivan Djelic <ivan.djelic@parrot.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: flash bbt broken due to unitialized bitflip_threshold?
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 10:34:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD0E632.2080905@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339054570.6875.84.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
On 06/07/2012 12:36 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 19:55 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote:
>> 1. on legacy systems with 1-bit nand and strength = 1, default bitflip_threshold is 1
>> 2. on legacy systems with 1-bit nand and strength > 1, default bitflip_threshold is 'strength'
>> 3. on new systems with 2+ bit nand and strength > 1, default bitflip_threshold is 'strength'
>
> Ivan, Shmulik,
>
> I've gave this another though, and I think it is OK to leave this as it
> is now. Your replies were very helpful, thanks.
Yes, many thanks guys. It seems I picked the wrong couple days to be away from
email.
This is not an issue on my docg4 because it does not use a flash-based BBT, but
instead scans the whole device for blocks that are marked bad in oob. EUCLEAN is
ignored in this case. The following code is present in both scan_block_full()
and scan_block_fast():
/* Ignore ECC errors when checking for BBM */
if (ret && !mtd_is_bitflip_or_eccerr(ret))
return ret;
Digging into this, it turns out this is a problem only in the case of:
(1) nand->td != NULL (flash-based BBT present)
(2) NAND_BBT_NO_OOB is not set
Here's the call stack for the above case, and with NAND_BBT_ABSPAGE not set
(this is true for the mxc_nand controller). The problem occurs in
scan_read_raw_oob()...
nand_scan_bbt()
|
+-> search_read_bbts() ignores return code
|
+-> search_bbt() always returns 1
|
+-> scan_read_raw() -EUCLEAN propagated up
|
+-> scan_read_raw_oob() returns without updating buf, len, offs
|
+-> mtd_read_oob() -EUCLEAN returned
I addition to the patch suggested by Shmulik, I would also suggest the
following, in the interest of consistency with the bad block scanning code, and
also thoroughness:
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
index 30d1319..ed59aa8 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int scan_read_raw_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t
*buf, loff_t offs,
res = mtd_read_oob(mtd, offs, &ops);
- if (res)
+ if (res && !mtd_is_bitflip_or_eccerr(res))
return res;
buf += mtd->oobsize + mtd->writesize;
Shmulik, please let me know if yuo'd like me to submit the patch you suggested,
and I will do so promptly. Otherwise, thanks again!
More gory details... by comparison, here's the call stack for the same case,
except NAND_BBT_NO_OOB is set. Here, there's no problem.
nand_scan_bbt()
|
+-> search_read_bbts() ignores return code
|
+-> search_bbt() always returns 1
|
+-> scan_read_raw() -EUCLEAN propagated up
|
+-> scan_read_raw_data() -EUCLEAN propagated up
|
+-> mtd_read_oob() -EUCLEAN returned
Thanks, and sorry for the oversight,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-07 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-05 22:06 flash bbt broken due to unitialized bitflip_threshold? Sascha Hauer
2012-06-06 9:50 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-06 13:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-06 15:15 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-06 15:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-06 16:08 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-06 17:55 ` Ivan Djelic
2012-06-07 7:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-07 14:02 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-07 17:34 ` Mike Dunn [this message]
2012-06-07 21:07 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-10 7:08 ` Shmulik Ladkani
2012-06-22 20:39 ` Brian Norris
2012-06-25 17:44 ` Mike Dunn
2012-06-07 7:43 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD0E632.2080905@newsguy.com \
--to=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ivan.djelic@parrot.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox