From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from oproxy5.bluehost.com ([2605:dc00:100:2::a5] helo=oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com) by merlin.infradead.org with smtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SjBxC-0006F6-5i for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 16:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: <4FE88E9A.4040605@xenotime.net> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:15:22 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Pereira da Silva Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix build warning References: <1340637580-12711-1-git-send-email-aletes.xgr@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1340637580-12711-1-git-send-email-aletes.xgr@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Adrian Hunter , Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/25/2012 08:19 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote: > Fix: > fs/ubifs/dir.c: In function 'ubifs_rename': > fs/ubifs/dir.c:972:15: warning: 'saved_nlink' may be used uninitialized > in this function > > Initilize saved_nlink to 0 Does nlink need to be init at all? is the warning bogus or valid? If the warning is bogus, the preferred solution is: #include ... unsigned int uninitialized_var(nlink); > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva > --- > fs/ubifs/dir.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > index a6d42ef..d5b8cb1e 100644 > --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c > +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c > @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ static int ubifs_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry, > struct ubifs_budget_req ino_req = { .dirtied_ino = 1, > .dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(old_inode_ui->data_len, 8) }; > struct timespec time; > - unsigned int saved_nlink; > + unsigned int saved_nlink = 0; > > /* > * Budget request settings: deletion direntry, new direntry, removing -- ~Randy