From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from a.ns.miles-group.at ([95.130.255.143] helo=radon.swed.at) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SmL3x-000396-HQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 08:35:54 +0000 Message-ID: <4FF4005E.1070106@nod.at> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 10:35:42 +0200 From: Richard Weinberger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shmulik Ladkani Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ubi: Fix bad PEBs reserve caclulation References: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1341389164-24409-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Richard Genoud , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Artem Bityutskiy List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04.07.2012 10:05, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > Shmulik Ladkani (5): > ubi: introduce ubi->bad_peb_limit > ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling > ubi: kill CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE > ubi: trivial: fix comment of ubi_calculate_reserved() > ubi: harmonize the update of ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs Has this patch set an impact on UBI fastmap? ...wondering why I'm CC'd. :-) Thanks, //richard