From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from co1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.180.187] helo=co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SwOY6-0003eW-Vo for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 02:20:35 +0000 Message-ID: <501892C1.7060502@freescale.com> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:21:53 +0800 From: Huang Shijie MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mtd: nand: allow NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE to be set from driver References: <1343696537-2564-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <50178A45.3000406@parrot.com> <501803C5.8080105@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <501803C5.8080105@freescale.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Marek Vasut , Artem Bityutskiy , Matthieu CASTET , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , =E4=BA=8E 2012=E5=B9=B408=E6=9C=8801=E6=97=A5 00:11, Scott Wood =E5=86=99= =E9=81=93: > Why is it better to lie about ECC geometry than to just say "subpage > writes aren't supported"? Does/will the ECC geometry get used by upper yes. I think it's better to provide an official method to let the driver=20 say: " i do not support the subpage writes." Huang Shijie