From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.3]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SwoRi-0000hU-7F for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 05:59:43 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp03.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:29:37 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id q725xYuD28246252 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:29:34 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id q725xY0Y001100 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:59:34 +1000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([9.123.236.172]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id q725wwdq031968 for ; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:59:33 +1000 Message-ID: <501A1720.6000604@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 13:58:56 +0800 From: hejianet MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: jffs2 copy too long after mounting References: <5019EE49.7000208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <5019EE49.7000208@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 2012-08-02 11:04, hejianet wrote: > hi All > my kernel is 2.6.16 > after mounting the nand flash with jffs2 partition, the first copy operation > for a 15M file(from jffs2 partition to jffs2 partition) take 9 > minutes,but the > second copy operation takes 1 minutes. > the disk usage(df result) is over 85%. > I wonder is there any patch ported to such old kernel? > Thanks > > B.R. > Jia > > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ > > > Is there anyway to show the summary result of jffs2's fragmentation? Is there anyway to manually make defragmentation? Thanks Jia