From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <502E2EDB.2050200@antcom.de> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 13:45:31 +0200 From: Roland Stigge MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: LPC32xx: Provide DMA filter callbacks via platform data References: <1345122935-22115-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <1345201311.27859.51.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <1345201835.27859.52.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <201208171140.50388.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201208171140.50388.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: srinivas.bakki@nxp.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kevin.wells@nxp.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, aletes.xgr@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 08/17/2012 01:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> Actually the mtd patches do not compile-depend on it, sorry, I am >> dropping it from the MTD tree. Thanks! > > For reference, I'm fine with either outcome, I don't mind seeing an > occasional collision with subsystem trees, as they tend to be trivial > to resolve. > > If you split a series to go through multiple git trees, you have to > ensure that both halves are actually regression free by themselves, Of course. But in this very case, they are. So I'd prefer pushing them via different trees because I have other patches for mach-lpc32xx in the queue and would like to minimize work for you. :-) Roland