From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ey0-f177.google.com ([209.85.215.177]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1THgUA-0004Th-Mw for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 19:44:31 +0000 Received: by eaan13 with SMTP id n13so659411eaa.36 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5065FE29.5080302@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:44:41 +0200 From: Sasha Levin MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: mtd: kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/pat.c:279! References: <1340959739.2936.28.camel@lappy> <1347057778.26695.68.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1347062045.26695.82.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1347202600.5876.7.camel@sbsiddha-ivb> <505068F4.4080309@gmail.com> <50506A6C.30109@gmail.com> <50656733.3040609@gmail.com> <1348855547.1556.3.camel@kyv> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, Artem Bityutskiy , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-mm , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Dave Jones , Andrew Morton , dwmw2@infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 09/28/2012 09:13 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> >> I am not the maintainer, but please, go ahead an push your fix. I do not >> have time to test it myself and it does not look like anyone else in the >> small mtd community does. > > Grr. I told people that patch wasn't tested. I hadn't even *compiled* > it. It has a typo ("inlint" instead of "inline" - so close). > > Sasha said he had tested it, but nobody even mentioned this thing. Now > I'm nervous. I had committed it in my tree and was just about to push > it out when I decided that I should at least compile it despite the > "tested-by". > > Hmm? Now I really *really* want to know that it's been tested on > actual hardware too. Sasha, what patch did you actually test? Did you > just fix the "inlint" thing, or was there something else entirely? I've just fixed the inlint thing since it was pretty trivial, I didn't bother commenting on it since I figured it would turn into an actual patch from someone who could test it on actual hardware first. Note that I've tested it on a KVM guest, and not on real hardware - so I'm not sure how much of a test that is. Thanks, Sasha