From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from hex.linuxgrrls.org ([212.18.228.73] helo=mail.linuxgrrls.org ident=postfix) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.14 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 19nHJB-0003mS-0G for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:34:25 +0100 Message-ID: <50684.192.91.75.30.1060864451.squirrel@mail.linuxgrrls.org> In-Reply-To: <1060863668.3152.72.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> References: <3F3B75AA.6050701@elsoft.ch> <1060861648.3152.70.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> <3F3B7D66.5030907@elsoft.ch> <1060863668.3152.72.camel@passion.cambridge.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:34:11 +0100 (BST) From: jasmine@linuxgrrls.org To: "David Woodhouse" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: "\"David =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=FCller?=" cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: JFFS2 internals question List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , David wrote: > I think we do make read calls which cross a page boundary, yes. And the inability to handle such calls was the reason that the old DiskOnChip driver didn't work with jffs2, as I recall. -Jasmine.