From: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com>
To: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: at91: atmel_nand: return bit flips for the PMECC read_page()
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 10:06:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B50143.7080408@newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AD9E8E.7050402@atmel.com>
On 11/21/2012 07:39 PM, Josh Wu wrote:
> Hi, Nicolas
>
> On 11/21/2012 6:05 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 11/21/2012 06:14 AM, Josh Wu :
>>>
>> Can we have more comment to figure out why it is needed please?
>
> I will add following comment in the commit message in the v2 version.
>
> Since the commit: 3f91e94f7f511de74c0d2abe08672ccdbdd1961c ("mtd: nand:
> read_page() returns max_bitflips ()")
> The ecc.read_page() method for nand drivers is changed to return the maximum
> number of bitflips instead of just returning 0.
>
> And the nand.h is also explain that. I would like to adapt to it.
This patch avails the atmel_nand device of a change that was merged to the
kernel mtd code several months ago. That change fixed a problem where higher
layers that use the -EUCLEAN return code to make judgements on block wear (e.g.
ubi) were marking blocks as bad when a normal number of bitflip corrections were
made. The problem affected newer nands with greater ecc strength. See the
entry on 'bitflip_threshold' in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-mtd
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-27 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-21 5:14 [PATCH] MTD: at91: atmel_nand: return bit flips for the PMECC read_page() Josh Wu
2012-11-21 10:05 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-11-22 3:39 ` Josh Wu
2012-11-27 18:06 ` Mike Dunn [this message]
2012-11-26 20:38 ` Mike Dunn
2012-11-27 2:31 ` Josh Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B50143.7080408@newsguy.com \
--to=mikedunn@newsguy.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox