From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Ti1Gg-0002ce-P4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:11:27 +0000 Received: from mail.er.corscience.de (mail.er.corscience.de [192.168.1.6]) by corscience.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B4551EAF for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:11:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.102.103] (azuregos.2og.er.corscience.de [192.168.102.103]) by mail.er.corscience.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E62F3347A147 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:11:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50C5C35C.4050804@corscience.de> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:11:24 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBCaWXDn21hbm4=?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: U-boot bch4_sw vs omap bch4_hw References: <20121208082935.GA17392@parrot.com> <50C5BAD6.2010500@corscience.de> In-Reply-To: <50C5BAD6.2010500@corscience.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 10.12.2012 11:35, Andreas Bie=C3=9Fmann wrote: > Hi Ivan Djelic and Jean-Philippe Francois, >=20 > On 10.12.2012 10:41, jean-philippe francois wrote: >> 2012/12/8 Ivan Djelic : >=20 > * use 1-bit hamming 'ROM-layout' for SPL mtd and 4-bit BCH8 in all > other sections, see my u-boot patches. it is in fact 8-bit BCH (not 4-bit). I have chosen BCH8 here cause some OMAP3 seem to have broken BCH4. The kernel also recommends to use BCH8 for the same cause. However this can be made configurable in u-boot. best regards Andreas Bie=C3=9Fmann