From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] at91: PMECC: enable PMECC in dt for at91sam9x5ek, at91sam9n12ek
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:44:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51186901.9060400@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130210004010.GE16278@quad.lixom.net>
Hi, Olof
On 2/10/2013 8:40 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 01/23/2013 01:47 PM, Josh Wu :
>>> Those patches will enable PMECC in dt parameters for at91sam9x5ek and
>>> at91sam9n12ek.
>>>
>>> The PMECC driver will check minimum required ecc on ONFI parameter from NAND
>>> flash.
>>>
>>> If pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in dts file is specified, use those two.
>>> otherwise, set those according to NAND flash ONFI parameters.
>>>
>>> If the pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in dts are different with ecc requirement
>>> in ONFI, print out a warning.
>>>
>>>
>>> For the following compile error:
>>> ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pinctrl_ssc0_tx"
>>>
>>> ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output)
>>> make[2]: *** [arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek.dtb] Error 2
>>>
>>> the fixes are already merged in Linux mainline in v3.8-rc4.
>>> you can find in:
>>> 544ae6b2e676c3c37fb8c93ef9327932fc2e5bc2 (ARM: at91/dts: add pinctrl support for SSC peripheral)
>>> ea03c81521bde526570e1dec96eaa21fe5ac84a2 (ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl selection to driver)
>> Artem,
>>
>> I propose to take patches 2 and 3/5 of this series via arm-soc git tree.
>> I will specify to merge them at the end of the merge-window so that the
>> Device Tree properties will not be out-of-sync with driver modifications
>> (may not cause big issues anyway).
> I'm not cc:d on the patches, but if it's just new properties then there's
> no reason to hold off to "late in the merge window". There's actually no
> way for you to hold that off yourself, since we won't accept new patches
> to arm-soc that late.
>
> I don't see any cc to devicetree-discuss of the device tree bindings
> though, and no update of Documentation/device-tree/bindings/, so the
> patches are not ready to go in yet.
Since in my commit: a41b51a1f7c15a1b00f30a3ad2d0373ad51b883d (mtd: at91:
add dt parameters for Atmel PMECC), it already added following
properties to DT documentation:
atmel,pmecc-cap
atmel,pmecc-sector-size
atmel,pmecc-lookup-table-offset
so in this patches series, NO. 2 and 3 just add it to at91 board's dts
file according to the DT documentation.
Indeed, this patch series make a little bit different from the DT
documentation, that is: the ROM code mapping size are smaller than the
DT documentation example.
But original DT documentation example still works.
So I think the DT documentation's explanation are proper for this patch
series. It seems I don't have to update the DT documentation so far.
>
>
> -Olof
Best Regards,
Josh Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-11 3:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 12:47 [PATCH 0/5 v3] at91: PMECC: enable PMECC in dt for at91sam9x5ek, at91sam9n12ek Josh Wu
2013-01-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 1/5] MTD: atmel_nand: avoid to report an error when lookup table offset is 0 Josh Wu
2013-01-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: at91: at91sam9x5: add DT parameters to enable PMECC Josh Wu
2013-01-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: at91: at91sam9n12: " Josh Wu
2013-01-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] MTD: atmel_nand: make pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in dts is optional Josh Wu
2013-01-23 12:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] MTD: at91: atmel_nand: for PMECC, add code to check the ONFI parameter ECC requirement Josh Wu
2013-02-07 3:04 ` [PATCH 0/5 v3] at91: PMECC: enable PMECC in dt for at91sam9x5ek, at91sam9n12ek Josh Wu
2013-02-07 16:16 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-02-08 16:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-02-10 0:40 ` Olof Johansson
2013-02-11 3:44 ` Josh Wu [this message]
2013-02-12 15:01 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51186901.9060400@atmel.com \
--to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox