From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Umje8-0004QX-1g for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:55:24 +0000 Message-ID: <51B862D6.2080807@intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:00:22 +0300 From: Adrian Hunter MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Prins Anton (ST-CO/ENG1.1)" Subject: Re: UBIFS failure & stable page writes References: <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E8CB9B7@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E8CBA85@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <20130527121828.GA32625@quack.suse.cz> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E8CBB8D@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <1369709828.5446.89.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E8CBD81@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <1369727042.5446.112.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E8CBE33@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <1369732266.5446.117.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E91DC9C@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <1369810158.5446.208.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3E91E697@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <1370239282.21714.21.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3EA0F38E@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> <51B82A1D.30009@intel.com> <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3F1A3508@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> In-Reply-To: <85D877DD6EE67B4A9FCA9B9C3A4865670C3F1A3508@SI-MBX14.de.bosch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 12/06/13 14:13, Prins Anton (ST-CO/ENG1.1) wrote: > Does it make sense to use chk_orphans? That checks for missing orphans but the problem is the opposite: the presence of orphans that should not be there. > > I suppose I have to do: $ echo "1" > chk_orphans > > Or am I wrong? > > Met vriendelijke groeten | Best Regards, > Anton Prins >