From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from saarni.dnainternet.net ([83.102.40.136]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VC5Cm-0005gd-QC for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:59:59 +0000 Message-ID: <52148F7B.7090409@iki.fi> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:59:23 +0300 From: Jussi Kivilinna MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH] alauda: do not use stack for URB transfer_buffers References: <20130806120329.8864.36301.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <20130821073028.GB31788@brian-ubuntu> <87li3v79uo.fsf@nemi.mork.no> <20130821084154.GE31788@brian-ubuntu> In-Reply-To: <20130821084154.GE31788@brian-ubuntu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: David Woodhouse , Joern Engel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , =?UTF-8?B?QmrDuHJuIE1vcms=?= List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 21.08.2013 11:41, Brian Norris wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:59:27AM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> Brian Norris writes: >>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:03:29PM +0300, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: >>>> Patch fixes alauda not to use stack as URB transfer_buffer. URB buffers need to >>>> be DMA-able, which stack is not. >>>> >>>> Patch is only compile tested. >>>> >>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >>>> Signed-off-by: Jussi Kivilinna >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mtd/nand/alauda.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >>> >>> Just FYI, this driver is being removed, so I'm obviously not taking this >>> patch :) >> >> I think you should apply it anyway. The driver is still in v3.11 AFAICS, >> and the patch should also go to the maintained stable kernels. You >> cannot remove the driver from them, and I don't see a later driver >> removal as a valid reason not to fix a known bug with a patch. > > Seriously? > > The reasons given for removal: > > "The driver has very low utility. Devices in question are limited to > about 400kB/s and the only known user (me) discarded the hardware > several years back." > > And: > > "Maybe we should just remove the driver and not spend any more time on > it?" > > So you're suggesting applying an untested (compile-only) fix for an > unobserved bug for the theoretical user of old, slow hardware who wants > to use a recent stable kernel, when the last known user has given up on > the driver entirely? > > Anyway, just because you complained, I rebased and applied this to > l2-mtd.git before the driver removal. I'll defer to dwmw2 whether this > patch gets squashed out of existence. If this is the case, please ignore this patch. I should not have marked it for stable in first place, since it is just compile-tested. -Jussi > > Brian >