public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	computersforpeace@gmail.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: fix the warning when CONFIG_OF is not defined
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 15:02:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <522437E8.1050604@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130831170422.GA21617@localhost>

Hi, Ezequiel

On 9/1/2013 1:04 AM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:23:53PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 11:36 +0800, Josh Wu wrote:
>>> This patch fix following warning:
>>>
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c:2007: warning: 'atmel_nand_nfc_match' defined but not used
>>>
>>> This patch add '#if defined(CONFIG_OF)' block to guard around the definition of
>>> atmel_nand_nfc_match, in order to avoid the warning when kernel is configurated
>>> as non-dt supported.
>> Ick. This driver is littered with CONFIG_OF checks. Yet I've just seen a
>> patch to pxa3xx_nand which *removes* ifdefs, on the basis that all the
>> of_match_ functions/macros will just 'do the right thing'. Can't we do
>> that here too? We might just need to add __maybe_unused?
>>
> We can. We just need to provide a few dummy functions in linux/of_mtd.h
> just like the other of_xxx() are doing. See below!
>
>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>>>   static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = {
>>>   	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" },
>>>   	{ /* sentinel */ }
>>>   };
>>> +#endif
>> Also, why doesn't this one appear in a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() ?
>>
> Indeed. And why doesn't it have a "const" keyword?

Thanks to point these out.

>
> So, in order to remove the CONFIG_OF safely from this driver,
> and avoid any stupid warnings, we need to first implement
> these dummies:
>
> --------------------------------8<-----------------------------------
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_mtd.h b/include/linux/of_mtd.h
> index ed7f267..66f173e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_mtd.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,21 @@
>   int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np);
>   int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np);
>   bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np);
> +#else
> +static inline int of_get_nand_ecc_mode(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int of_get_nand_bus_width(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
>   #endif
>   
>   #endif /* __LINUX_OF_MTD_H */
> -------------------------------->8-----------------------------------
>
> And then, with this little patch, we get rid of the ugly CONFIG_OF check
> from the atmel_nand driver:
>
> --------------------------------8<-----------------------------------
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index 0e365da..ac58098 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> @@ -1448,7 +1448,6 @@ static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode)
>   		ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST);
>   }
>   
> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>   static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
>   			      struct device_node *np)
>   {
> @@ -1456,7 +1455,7 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
>   	u32 offset[2];
>   	int ecc_mode;
>   	struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board;
> -	enum of_gpio_flags flags;
> +	enum of_gpio_flags flags = 0;
>   
>   	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) {
>   		if (val >= 32) {
> @@ -1539,13 +1538,6 @@ static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> -#else
> -static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
> -			      struct device_node *np)
> -{
> -	return -EINVAL;
> -}
> -#endif
>   
>   static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   					 struct atmel_nand_host *host)
> @@ -2205,14 +2197,12 @@ static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
>   static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" },
>   	{ /* sentinel */ }
>   };
>   
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids);
> -#endif
>   
>   static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> @@ -2251,12 +2241,11 @@ static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> -static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = {
> +static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" },
>   	{ /* sentinel */ }
>   };
> -#endif
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match);
>   
>   static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = {
>   	.driver = {
> -------------------------------->8-----------------------------------
>
> Of course, these are untested. If they look OK and don't cause any trouble,
> then I'll prepare proper patches.

Looks nice to me. Your proposal patch does the right thing to remove the 
CONFIG_OF.
So please sent them out. ;)

Best Regards,
Josh Wu

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-02  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07  3:36 [PATCH] mtd: atmel_nand: fix the warning when CONFIG_OF is not defined Josh Wu
2013-08-07  6:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2013-08-30 20:23 ` David Woodhouse
2013-08-31 17:04   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-09-02  7:02     ` Josh Wu [this message]
2013-09-02 17:13       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-09-03  3:57         ` Josh Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=522437E8.1050604@atmel.com \
    --to=josh.wu@atmel.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox